WSCRC

Washington State China Relations Council

  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
    • Mission and History
    • Board of Directors & Staff
    • Washington State China Relations Fund
  • MEMBERSHIP
    • Membership Levels
    • Member Directory
    • Member Spotlight
  • EVENTS & PROGRAMS
    • Events Calendar
    • Recent News
    • Videos & Webinars

Apr 19 2021

WSCRC Editorial on Engaging and Competing with China to Boost Washington’s Economic Recovery in the Seattle Times

Engage and compete with China to boost Washington’s economic recovery

This Op-ed was published online on April 16 and in print on April 18.

The recent frosty consultations between senior Chinese and U.S. officials in Anchorage brought into stark relief the scale of the challenges that must be navigated within this crucial bilateral relationship. These challenges resonate strongly here in Washington, for no state is more on the front line, or has more at stake, in U.S.-China relations.

The erosion in U.S.-China relations has had a punishing effect on our state’s economy. In 2020, Washington state exports to China were just $3.5 billion, down from $14.6 billion (adjusted for inflation) in 2018. Non-aerospace exports fell more than 27% in real terms in 2019 before rebounding 15% in 2020. Most notably, export sales of aircraft to China fell from an average of $11.7 billion per year (adjusted for inflation) in the years 2014-2018 to zero in 2019.

Many of the issues raised by the Trump administration, from weak intellectual property enforcement to unfair trade practices, were longstanding and legitimate concerns among the business community. But the approach, including tariffs and a go-it-alone strategy, was incoherent, haphazard and ineffective.

The Biden administration needs a fresh approach to meet the challenges of an ever more aggressive China. While maintaining the Trump tariffs in the near term, the new administration recognizes that the previous policy single-handedly confronting China was a failure that made little progress on China’s market interventions and burdened U.S. consumers with higher prices from tariffs. Biden’s team must rapidly rebuild a coalition of allies to push back against China’s aggressiveness and align international institutions on the actions and reforms China must take. Coupled with efforts to further level the playing field for U.S. companies doing business with China are steps that the administration must take which will directly improve Washington communities and businesses by improving American industry’s global competitiveness.

Members of the Washington State China Relations Council, and the Washington business community more broadly, have constructive ideas for how U.S. policy toward China should be shaped. The council has consulted with a wide range of organizations across many sectors of our state’s economy. Five core themes rise to the top of policy recommendations members and businesses would like federal, state and local governments to implement. While these policies are national in scope, we believe they’ll show positive returns in Washington state.

First, remove barriers that impede America’s trade with China. The new administration must exert constructive pressure, as a country and with its allies to call out China for its mercantilist trade policies and overzealous protection and manipulation of its home market in favor of Chinese companies. This includes reviewing and eliminating tariffs imposed under the Trump administration — particularly those proven to harm American businesses and households — significantly strengthening intellectual property protections and enforcement and eliminating non-tariff and regulatory trade barriers to Washington goods and services in China. We must have true reciprocity where U.S., UK, EU, and Canadian companies, for example, have the exact same access and operating rights that China enjoys in these open markets — making clear to Beijing what is at risk if reform is not rapid and comprehensive.

Second, strengthen U.S. visa policies to encourage the best and brightest to pursue education, research and investment opportunities in Washington state. Chinese students, researchers, professionals and visitors contribute enormously to our state’s economic competitiveness and the rich cultural fabric of our communities.

Third, strengthen domestic infrastructure and investment — at both the federal and state levels — to improve our global competitiveness. This includes critical transportation, broadband and digital infrastructure, as well as investment in state and local economic development initiatives that play a pivotal role in building and sustaining Washington’s labor competitiveness and our trade and investment relationship with China.

Fourth, seek constructive new areas for cooperation with China, focused on shared interests. Climate change should be priority No. 1. President Xi Jinping has made bold commitments for China to quickly reach peak carbon emissions and carbon neutrality, aided by investments in clean energy. The Biden administration’s creation of a climate czar signals a similar commitment to address one of the world’s most pressing issues, and we are encouraged that these bilateral discussions will progress following the Anchorage meeting. Collaboration on climate change is not a choice, it’s a necessity, and will present real opportunities for Washington businesses.

Finally, we must recognize that that the issue of human rights, as manifest by our divergent viewpoints regarding Hong Kong and Xinjiang, and sensitive issues in the areas of military or economic coercion could, if not managed with a balance of strategy and force, derail the global economy. The reality is that the U.S., with its allies, together with China, are the dominant foundations of the global economy of this century, and it would be irresponsible if issues in these areas force economic disengagement. In addition to necessary domestic resilience of critical supply chains, our national security also requires full competition and economic engagement with China in all markets. This is the essential difference from the Cold War approach to the Soviet Union.

Washington state has the opportunity to model a way forward in advocating and implementing policies that advance the kind of constructive, competitive U.S.-China relationship that our communities and businesses want to see. Our global competitiveness requires economic access and engagement with China, its markets and human talent. We would be irresponsible if we pursued policies that forced either country to wholly disengage commercially from the global economy.

Written by

Apr 13 2021

WSCRC Presents for the Economic Alliance of Snohomish County

The Executive Director of the Washington State China Relations Council (WSCRC), Nor Coquillard, along with WSCRC members Spencer Cohen of High Peak Strategy and David Zhou of IM2China spoke at a webinar sponsored by the Economic Alliance of Snohomish County (EASC) on April 13th. The talk was part of EASC’s weekly “Coffee Chat” series. Other recent “Coffee Chat” speakers have included Rick Steves of travel fame and Anne Marie Cauce, the President of the University of Washington.

Nor kicked off the even with an outline of the history of the WSCRC and then shared some high-level observations about the current state of the U.S.-China Relationship. He also highlighted some potential opportunities for businesses in the China market. Spencer shared his analysis of the trading relationship between the U.S. and China and then narrowed down his comments to describe the products and volumes that Washington exports to China. David explained how companies must establish themselves if they want to be successful in the China market and shared some advice on how this could be done.

The program’s recording can be viewed here: https://youtu.be/R_dIOK8eCwA

Written by

Apr 05 2021

WSCRC Executive Director Comments on What It All Means for Washington State-China Relations with U.S.-China Tit for Tat Continuing After Alaska

By Wen Liu, Read the original article here

Frosty and fiery did not just describe the atmosphere of the top U.S.-China diplomatic meeting in Alaska over a week ago, they may also do the same of a new, or post-Alaska, phase of the bilateral relations.

At the end of the meeting, China’s foreign affairs chief Director Yang said, “This strategic exchange was frank, constructive and helpful,” but “of course, there are major disputes between us.” Secretary of State Blinken said, “We expected to have tough and direct talks on a wide range of issues, and that’s exactly what we had.”

On Iran, North Korea, Afghanistan, climate, the two sides’ interests intersected, Blinken said, while on economics, trade, technology, “…we told our counterparts that we are reviewing these issues with close consultation with Congress, with our allies and partners. And we will move forward on – in a way that fully protects and advances the interests of workers and our businesses.”

For a leading exporter to China like Washington state, also with an all-round and historical relationship with China, what did the Alaska meeting, with those “major disputes,” “tough and direct talks,” mean? To best answer the question, we have here today none other than Norwell Coquillard, executive director of the Washington State China Relations Council.


Q1: We all watched the confrontational exchanges at the U.S.-China meeting in Alaska, but the tit for tat didn’t end there. On March 22, the U.S. along with the EU, the UK and Canada imposed new sanctions on top Chinese officials for human rights violations in Xinjiang. On March 24, China’s State Council issued “The Report on Human Rights Violations in the United States in 2020,” with chapters on “Incompetent pandemic containment,” “American democracy disorder,” “Racial discrimination,” etc. With such testy actions and reactions, how do you see U.S.-China relations, with and after Alaska?

Coquillard: U.S.- China Relations are certainly strained these days and the meeting in Alaska, outwardly, did not appear to improve them. Certainly, the public statements from Yang Jiechi and Secretary Blinken left observers with little to feel good about. Reports are, however, that after the acerbic opening speeches, speeches that appeared to be aimed at both parties’ respective domestic audiences, that the diplomats settled down and entered into serious discussions.

My take is that the U.S. will base its interactions with China on three legs; China as a business competitor, China as a strategic adversary and China as a collaboration partner to address global issues such as climate change and the pandemic. I have heard little from the Alaska meeting regarding business competition between China and the U.S. In fact, I understand there was little discussion about the U.S-China Trade Agreement. Regarding China as an adversary this is where the issue of human rights is raised. The U.S. has its world view on human rights that is in direct contrast with China, and I do not see any comprise – on both sides – on this issue any time soon.

Regarding collaboration I believe this is where the U.S and China need to focus their efforts on the short term. Per above I do not see areas for compromise in business nor on the issue of human rights – so the parties should agree to disagree and move forward where there are issues of common interest. Small steps to repair the damaged relationship could be taken in visas, restoring closed consulates, subnational exchanges and coordinated actions to address climate change and the pandemic.

Q2: Secretary of State Blinken hasn’t said much about the topic of U.S.-China trade in the Alaska talks. But earlier in the year, the Biden administration said they were reviewing the U.S.-China Phase 1 trade deal reached under Trump. As for those tariffs, Katherine Tai, the new USTR, said they were a “legitimate tool” to counter China’s state-driven economic model and called for revamping global trade rules and eliminating the “gray areas” exploited by China. What are your views on those tariffs, the counter tariffs, and the “gray area” in doing business with China, especially with your many years of experience as a business and non-profit leader in China?

Coquillard: I am not in favor of tariffs and I think we should all recognize that the costs of the tariffs are borne by the citizens of the United States, not China. I also think the tariffs, which were in many cases were matched by China hurt U.S. companies that want to do business with China. Washington state apple and cherry farmers have lost market share in China due to the tariffs – and it may be very difficult to win that business back in the future even if tariffs are removed.

I do have a real problem with China’s state sponsored capitalism which can provide tremendous resources to support specific companies who are then able to dominate markets because of their size and access to cheap funding. There are huge subsidies available for Chinese companies that focus on the Made in China 2025 program, for example, subsidies which easily violate WTO rules. However, between the ineffectiveness of the WTO and China’s strong-armed tactics against objectors these programs continue. I was in China when it acceded to the WTO and I was and continued to be extremely disappointed to see how China has twisted WTO rules to keep its markets closed.

So, although I am not a fan of the tariffs, I believe that the current administration will want some concessions from China before they are eliminated.

Q3: Washington state has been a leader in trade with China for many years, especially if considered on a per capita basis. In 2014, Washington state was number one. That year, its exports to China reached $10 billion. With the fierce tariff war followed by a protracted coronavirus pandemic, what is Washington state’s trade with China like now, and maybe even in the next four years from your vantage point?

Coquillard: No state is more strategically positioned or impacted by developments within U.S.-China relations than Washington. In many respects, Washington state offers a microcosm of the U.S.-China economic relationship.

For many years the largest exporter to China among U.S. states, Washington’s world-leading, innovative advanced industries including aerospace, information technology, and life sciences have benefited from new and growing opportunities in China’s market. China is one of the most important global destinations for Washington’s agricultural exports, which support diverse communities and local economies across every region of the state. The rapid increase of Chinese students and researchers at Washington’s higher education institutions has contributed to developing even stronger foundations for the state’s future technology-driven economic prosperity. About a third of all inbound containers handled at Washington’s ports originate in China. The handling of this cargo directly and indirectly supports thousands of jobs across the state, including at marine terminals, warehouses, and intermodal operations.

The recent erosion in U.S.-China relations has adversely impacted Washington’s economy. In 2020, Washington state goods exports summed to just $3.5 billion, down from $14.6 billion (inflation-adjusted dollars) in 2018. Non-aerospace exports fell more than 27% in real terms in 2019 before rebounding 15% in 2020, despite the ongoing pandemic and disruptions to global supply chains and consumer demand. Notable increases included ultrasound equipment, wheat, and hay.

However, aircraft, which constitute the major share of Washington state exports, saw another year of decline, falling to $1.1 billion in 2020, compared with $11.7 billion in 2018 and an average of $11.1 billion between 2014 and 2018 (inflation-adjusted dollars). While Boeing aircraft were not included in China’s retaliatory tariff list during the height of the trade war, there were no new orders from China in 2018 and 2019, and just two in 2020 (though there remains a sizeable order backlog of 143 as of December 2020). Over the past ten years, China has been the source of 8% of all Boeing aircraft orders. The prolonged grounding of the 737 MAX also likely contributed to this decline in sales.

In short Washington’s economy has been badly damaged by the trade war. The quickest route to recovery would be an increase of sales and deliveries of aircraft. The harder job will be to recapture market share lost in agricultural exports and other products. At this point in time, with the tariffs in place and no serious economic talks between the U.S. and China it is difficult to predict when Washington’s exports to China will approach the levels seen in years like 2016 and 2017.

Q4: The Washington State China Relations Council has gone through several phases over its forty-some-year history, from building new relations from scratch to promoting China’s Most Favored Nation trade status, from expanding ties with China’s accession into the WTO to diversifying memberships, etc. Where is the Council now, or what is new with the Council, and where is the Council going, especially with the current bipartisan consensus in the Congress, and among Americans, on getting tough with China?

Coquillard: I commend you on your understanding of the history of the Council. We are now in our 41st year and still working to improve relations between Washington State and China. Our biggest challenge today is to ensure that there is balance and nuance in the discourse about China. We want to ensure that residents of Washington understand that China, especially doing business with China, impacts our lives. As mentioned earlier, there are many areas of disagreement between the U.S. and China but there also many areas where we do business together and can collaborate to solve global problems.

At the Council we are very active in producing educational events, like webinars, which focus on China issues that impact Washingtonians. Our webinars explore issues such as the success of Washington companies in China, how Chinese foreign investment affects our state, how various trade agreements impact our companies, and other issues. We also are active producing articles for our regional media which present our views on how Washington works with China. On the government side we are active providing information to our congressional delegations regarding the importance of trade with China to our local economy. We also consult the state and local governments in their dealings with China.

We hope to be perceived as a trusted resource providing accurate, timely information about relations between Washington and China. We also help make connections. For example, we are active in developing and maintaining relations with Chinese organizations such as municipal and provincial governments.

In 2020 we created a sister organization, The Washington State China Relations Fund, which is a charitable organization. We used this entity last year to import PPE to fight the pandemic and to raise funds to support those, especially in the Asian community, who were disadvantaged by the pandemic. Going forward we plan to use this new entity to create educational programs of interest beyond those of our immediate members and to become more involved with our local community.

 

Written by

Mar 23 2021

Washington State China Relations Council Statement on Asian Hate Crimes

The Washington State China Relations Council condemns the rise of hate crimes against people of Asian and Pacific ethnicity. As the country’s oldest state-level organization dedicated to improving ties with China, the Council strives to create relationships and build greater understanding among the people of China and the United States. We are saddened by the alarming increase in hateful speech and violence directed towards the Asian immigrant and AAPI communities and extend our support and condolences to all those affected.

Since the onset of COVID-19, the irresponsible labelling of the pandemic as the “China Virus” and other racially charged epithets have exacerbated a trend of increased discrimination and resentment towards immigrants in general, and specifically those from Asia. The Council stands with members of the AAPI community and celebrates the great contributions made to our shared community by Asians of all origins. Here in the Puget Sound region, Asian-Americans comprise a significant share of our population, adding diversity and vibrancy to our community. The heritage of our region is tied to the flourishing of a multi-cultural society which has long included Asians and Pacific Islanders.

The Council will continue to denounce both individual and institutional racism. We have worked for many years to increase cross-cultural understanding with Asia. We will be unceasing in our efforts to assure individuals of all ethnicities that this community is their community.   

Written by

Feb 04 2021

Washington State China Relations Council holds Annual Gala for over 200 Virtual Participants

The Washington State China Relations Council, the oldest state level organization devoted to improving ties with China, held its annual gala, virtually, on February 2nd.  The highlight of the evening was a conversation between former Ambassador to China Gary Locke and the former Prime Minister of Australia, Kevin Rudd.  These two experts expressed their ideas about how the U.S. and China can cooperate as well as compete in the future. The robust discussion was followed by an audience question and answer session.

The Council was pleased to welcome Congressman Rick Larsen, (D WA 02) who addressed the more than 200 people at the virtual event. Representative Larsen shared his ideas about steps the U.S. must take to what the United States must do to manage its increasingly fraught relationship with China.

After the Council’s Executive Director Nor Coquillard reviewed the organization’s 2020 activities and 2021 plans, the Director of the Council Man Wang introduced the audience to the Council’s sister, charitable organization the Washington State China Relations Fund.  Keeping with a Gala tradition, the Council awarded its 2021 Sidney Rittenberg Award for leadership in the advancement of Washington-China relations to former Council and long-time board member Gregg Rodgers.

Written by

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 23
  • Next Page »

Search

Language Option

Social Media

Address

Washington State China Relations Council

1301 5th Avenue, Suite 1500 Seattle, WA 98101-2611

Tel: (206) 441 - 4419

E-mail: info@wscrc.org

Contact Us

Copyright ©2021 Washington State China Relations Council. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2021 · Altitude Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Events

  • Responding to Anti-Asian Violence & Crime in Our Community -
    04/20/2021 4:00 pm - 5:00 pm
    • Violent attacks and other crimes against Asians and Pacific Islanders have increased dramatically in recent months all over the United States, including in our own region. The most violent of these was the murder of eight people in Atlanta on...
      • WSCRC EVENT
  • Book Talk: A conversation with the author of “Challenging China” -
    04/28/2021 4:00 pm - 5:00 pm
    • As people are discovering in recent months--whether in Alaska, Japan or Canada--U.S. presidents may come and go but thorny issues with China remain. In Challenging China, a new book published in early April of this year, Seattle's own Sam Kaplan asserts...
      • WSCRC EVENT